Skip to main content

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis

Project Description

The primary goal of this project is to explore the adoption of alternative publication models to promote more open science and to create a new system of disseminating completed research publications. What we hope to produce need not serve as an wholesale replacement for current journals but as an alternative to promote faster reviews, more transparency, collaboration, and more open access to the science we produce in every form. We are using the physics model of arXiv, the open access policy common in evidence-based medicine, and the data sharing policies of most genetics research as a point of departure for our working group and our vision of the future of science publishing. We will bring together participants from every aspect of the publication process in ecology and evolution from scientists to publishers, such as members of PLoS and arXiv, to the gatekeepers of academic databases, such as Google and ISI. To achieve our overarching goal, we will address the following three objectives. (1) To discuss how to more effectively promote ‘open science’ in ecology and evolution in general. The primary targets will be how to facilitate the linking of articles to their associated analytical and data attributes. Another target will be how to incorporate more of the discussion and review process associated with the end product including the decisions made in handling data and in analyzing and interpreting it in light of feedback from reviews. The deliverable will be a broad future directions paper on open science (including open access implications). (2) To discuss the viability of providing an arXiv pre-publication open forum for ecology and evolution and how to incorporate peer review into such a system (which arXiv currently does not). We will discuss whether the current journal and publication models in ecology and evolution are outdated or able to adapt. The primary deliverable from this objective will be a synthesis paper of the limitations and strengths of the current publication models (from publisher handling of journals to treatment of reviews) and a discussion of future directions. (3) The final objective will be to launch a version of the platform proposed. The critical elements will be discussed at the final meeting by a reduced roster of the participants. The targets of this objective will be to define key elements needed for ecology and evolution – specifically in an online model, identify keystone elements needed for a beta version, and develop a pipeline for launch and effective buy in by the community. Queen’s University has the capacity and staff to assist with providing the beta-version for two years including Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licensing, part-time staff, DOIs, and will include the ‘journal’ as part of the Open Journals System. In summary, this working group will provide an open-science synthesis publication, a balanced report on the state-of-the-art for publishing in ecology and evolution, and a beta-version of an alternative model as an open journal.
Working Group Participants

Principal Investigator(s)

Christopher J. Lortie, Jarrett E. Byrnes

Project Dates

Start: June 25, 2012

End: January 26, 2013

completed

Participants

Lonnie W. Aarssen
Queen's University
Stefano Allesina
University of Chicago
Edward B. Baskerville
University of Michigan
Charles Bazerman
University of California, Santa Barbara
Phil Bourne
University of California, San Diego
Amber E. Budden
University of New Mexico
Jarrett E. Byrnes
University of California, Santa Barbara
Bruce Caron
New Media Studio
Patricia Cruse
University of California, Office of the President
Jonathan Eisen
University of California, Davis
Michael B. Eisen
University of California, Berkeley
Joseph Genden
Michael E. Hochberg
Université de Montpellier II
Doug Jackson
University of Michigan
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (CBU)
Christopher J. Lortie
University of California, Santa Barbara
David Morrison
University of California, Santa Barbara
Cameron Neylon
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Owen Petchey
University of Sheffield
Mark P. Schildhauer
University of California, Santa Barbara
Paula Stephan
Georgia State University
Carol Tenopir
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Products

  1. Journal Article / 2012

    Science Open Reviewed: An online community connecting authors with reviewers for journals

  2. Journal Article / 2012

    Modeling peer review: An agent-based approach

  3. Journal Article / 2013

    The social biology professor: Effective strategies for social media engagement

  4. Journal Article / 2013

    The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation

  5. Journal Article / 2012

    Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals

  6. Journal Article / 2013

    The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication

  7. Journal Article / 2012

    Can blogging change how ecologists share ideas? In economics, it already has.

  8. Journal Article / 2012

    "Going green": Self-archiving as a means for dissemination of research output in ecology and evolution

  9. Journal Article / 2012

    Hansel und gretel: The future of publishing wicked witch-free

  10. Journal Article / 2012

    The value of scholarly reading in the life sciences

Are you part of a working group or visiting NCEAS for another opportunity? Check out our page of resources for you.

Learn More