NCEAS Working Groups
Making decisions on complex environmental problems
Project Description
Environmental scientists must often facilitate complex decision-making based on scientific data but subject to societal and other constraints on management options. Complexity arises from: (i) multiple, often incommensurable, criteria that must be incorporated into decisions; (ii) decisions that must reflect the often conflicting long- and short-term goals of multiple stakeholders; and (iii) decisions that must be made in the presence of risk and uncertainty. The purpose of this project is to characterize scenarios for environmental decision-making and develop a conceptual taxonomy of them; review existing methods for dealing with multiple criteria and objectives, multiple stakeholders, and risk and uncertainty; develop integrated protocols for the use of these methods for complex decision making scenarios in conservation, wildlife management and/or environmental science; develop software tools for some of the methods for which existing tools are inadequate; test protocols and tools against available data sets; and identify areas in which more research is needed.
Principal Investigator(s)
Helen M. Regan, Sahotra Sarkar
Project Dates
Start: January 1, 2007
End: January 31, 2008
completed
Participants
- Mark Burgman
- University of Melbourne
- Mark Colyvan
- University of Sydney
- Martin Drechsler
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
- James Dyer
- University of Texas, Austin
- Trevon Fuller
- University of Texas, Austin
- James Justus
- University of Texas, Austin
- Mark Lubell
- University of California, Davis
- Lynn A. Maguire
- Duke University
- Christopher R. Margules
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
- Tara G. Martin
- University of British Columbia
- Alexander Moffett
- University of Texas, Austin
- Helen M. Regan
- University of California, Riverside
- Kristina Rothley
- Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
- Mary Ruckelshaus
- NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Science Center
- Sahotra Sarkar
- University of Texas, Austin
- Brian Skyrms
- University of California, Irvine
Products
-
Journal Article / 2014
Voting systems for environmental decisions
-
Presentations / 2008
Aggregating beliefs: Consensus versus compromise
-
Presentations / 2008
Consensus among expert
-
Presentations / 2009
The conservation game
-
Presentations / 2009
The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable
-
Journal Article / 2010
The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable
-
Journal Article / 2011
The conservation game
-
Journal Article / 2010
Group decisions in biodiversity conservation: Implications from game theory
-
Presentations / 2008
Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental Value
-
Presentations / 2008
Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value
-
Journal Article / 2009
Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value
-
Journal Article / 2009
Response to Sagoff
-
Journal Article / 2010
A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models
-
Journal Article / 2008
Why intrinsic value is a poor basis for conservation decisions
-
Book Chapter / 2016
Using concepts of biodiversity in structured decision-making
-
Book Chapter / 2009
Conservation prioritization and uncertainty in planning inputs
-
Report or White Paper / 2008
Survey of group consensus methods